Economic Questions:
Does the bill allow flexibility to change techniques as robo-callers inevitably find ways around the new rules?
What is the business model of robocall criminals, and will criminal enforcement fix the problem?
Should the window for intentional violations be longer than three years?
Summary: Introduced by Sen. Thune (R-SD). A summary of the Act is as follows:
Gives the FCC authority to levy civil penalties of up to $10,000 per call on people who intentionally ignore telemarketing restrictions.
Increases the window for FCC to catch and take action against intentional violations to three years after the robocall is placed (currently, the FCC has a one year statute).
Encourages coordination between the relevant federal agencies, state AGs, and non-federal entities to identify and report to Congress on criminal prosecution of robocall scams at state and federal level.
Requires voice service providers to adopt call authentication technologies, which can legitimize a call before it comes to the consumer’s phone.
Directs FCC to create better rules to protect subscribers from receiving unwanted calls.
Supporters on both sides of the aisle agree that the increasing amount of robocalls are an extreme nuisance and threat to consumer protection. It is currently supported by AGs in all 50 states, commissioners at the FTC and FCC, and other consumer groups.
The FCC has also introduced an agency initiative to address robocalls, which would allow carriers to automatically register customers to call-blocking technology and block calls coming from numbers not recognized by the carriers.
References and Further Reading: